Current:Home > NewsCourt filing asks judge to rule that NCAA’s remaining NIL rules violate antitrust law-DB Wealth Institute B2 Reviews & Ratings
Court filing asks judge to rule that NCAA’s remaining NIL rules violate antitrust law
lotradecoin terms View Date:2024-12-25 16:39:19
NCAA President Charlie Baker’s recent proposal that would, among other things, allow colleges to pay athletes for the use of their names, images and likenesses (NIL) was cited by plaintiffs’ lawyers on Wednesday night as one of the reasons that a federal judge should abolish the association’s remaining NIL rules without a trial in their lawsuit against the NCAA and the nation’s top college conferences.
The filing asked U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken to issue a summary judgment ruling that the NCAA’s remaining NIL rules violate antitrust law, “with only the amount of damages to be determined at trial.”
Attorneys for the NCAA and the conferences have said in prior filings that current and former college athletes are seeking more than $1.4 billion in damages. The filings did not specify whether that figure takes into account the tripling of damages awards that occurs in successful antitrust cases. If it does not, then more than $4.2 billion could be at stake in the case.
The NCAA and the conferences also have the opportunity to ask Wilken to decide the case in their favor without a trial, and their deadline to do so is May 17.
Wilken already has granted class-action status to both the plaintiffs’ bid for an injunction that would end the NCAA’s NIL rules and their request for damages. Those decisions made the case applicable to thousands of athletes rather than only the named plaintiffs, former Arizona State men’s swimmer Grant House; former TCU and Oregon women’s basketball player Sedona Prince, who gained renown by drawing attention to disparities in the treatment of athletes in the NCAA men’s and women’s basketball tournaments; and former Illinois football player Tymir Oliver.
Citing the NCAA rules change in July 2021 that allowed athletes to begin making money from their NIL and Baker's proposal for further changes, the plaintiffs' lawyers wrote in Wednesday night's filing: "On this record, the case for summary judgment ... could not be stronger."
The plaintiffs’ lawyers called Baker’s proposal – which he has described as a way to allow schools with the NCAA’s highest-revenue sports programs to do more for their athletes while keeping Division I and its current championships structure intact – a “devastating admission” that “it is not possible for (the NCAA) to even raise a genuine issue of fact that the protection of competitive balance” could be a justification for the NCAA’s remaining NIL rules.
Under antitrust law, an otherwise illegal restraint on competition can be allowed to stand if it can be shown that it enhances competition and there are no less-restrictive alternatives to the restraint.
But the plaintiffs’ lawyers used Baker’s proposal in this regard, as well. In addition to allowing schools to make NIL deals with athletes, Baker has suggested a new competitive subdivision whose schools would be required “within the framework” of Title IX, the federal gender-equity law, to “invest at least $30,000 per year into an enhanced educational trust fund for at least half of the institution’s eligible student-athletes.”
The plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote that NCAA and the conference “cannot dispute that President Baker’s proposal to permit direct NIL payments and require various payments to athletes by the schools in the Power Five conferences would be a less restrictive alternative that President Baker himself has declared would be good for college sports and improve competitive balance. This pronouncement by President Baker is an admission by the NCAA that, by itself, establishes the existence of less restrictive alternatives.”
The plaintiffs are challenging the legality of the NCAA’s prior NIL rules, which barred such payments, and the legality of the current rules, which took effect on July 1, 2021, and allow athletes to make money from a variety of activities, including endorsements, making appearances, signing autographs and running camps or clinics. However, the plaintiffs note, the current rules prohibit schools and conferences from making NIL deals with athletes, including payments for the rights to use their NIL in live television broadcasts.
A sizable portion of the damages that the plaintiffs are seeking stems from their contention that athletes are entitled to a share of the billions of dollars in college sports TV revenue not only now, but also reaching back to 2016. That date is four years prior to when the suit was initially filed, the reach-back period allowed under antitrust law.
In Wednesday night’s filing, the plaintiffs’ lawyers also argued against what they said were the NCAA’s contentions that, without the current NIL rules, so-called non-revenue sports would face elimination and that schools ability to comply with Title IX’s gender-equity requirements would be harmed.
On the gender-equity issue, the plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that if the Title IX were to apply to schools’ possible NIL payments to athletes “then it just means (the NCAA and the conferences) will have to consider gender equality when making them, as President Baker has stated in his proposal …” They also contend that if athletes can receive money from conferences for the use of their NIL under TV contracts the conferences negotiate, the conferences “should not be subject to Title IX” because they do not receive government funding.
As for the alleged threat to non-revenue sports, the plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote that “the crux of” the NCAA’s and the conferences’ position is “it would be too expensive for certain schools (competitors) to continue to support non-revenue sports programs and investments that purportedly benefit student athletes (such as exorbitant coaching and administrator salaries, as well as luxury facilities) to the same degree if they were permitted to make direct NIL payments.”
veryGood! (6134)
Related
- US Army intelligence analyst pleads guilty to selling military secrets to China
- In new filing, Trump lawyers foreshadow potential lines of defense in classified documents case
- Top NATO military officer urges allies and leaders to plan for the unexpected in Ukraine
- Two Malaysian filmmakers are charged with offending the religious feelings of others in banned film
- Wildfires are growing under climate change, and their smoke threatens farmworkers, study says
- An investigation is underway after police raided the wrong Ohio house, sending baby to ICU
- The Supreme Court takes up major challenges to the power of federal regulators
- A freed Israeli hostage relives horrors of captivity and fears for her husband, still held in Gaza
- Wisconsin’s Evers urges federal judge not to make changes at youth prison in wake of counselor death
- Qatar and France send medicine for hostages in Gaza as war rages on and regional tensions spike
Ranking
- Emily in Paris' Ashley Park Reveals How Lily Collins Predicted Her Relationship With Costar Paul Forman
- Sudan suspends ties with east African bloc for inviting paramilitary leader to summit
- Amid scrutiny, Boeing promises more quality checks. But is it enough?
- Alaska lawmakers open new session with House failing to support veto override effort
- Don't be fooled by the name and packaging: Fruit snacks are rarely good for you. Here's why.
- Top official says Kansas courts need at least $2.6 million to recover from cyberattack
- California emergency services official sued for sexual harassment, retaliation
- Patrick Schwarzenegger, Aimee Lou Wood and More Stars Check in to White Lotus Season 3
Recommendation
-
Rob Schneider seeks forgiveness from daughter Elle King after 'fat camp' claims
-
Bills face more weather-related disruptions ahead AFC divisional playoff game vs. Chiefs
-
Biden administration asks Supreme Court to intervene in its dispute with Texas over border land
-
'I was being a big kid': Michigan man's 7-foot snow sculpture of orca draws visitors
-
New York county signs controversial mask ban meant to hide people's identities in public
-
The Leap from Quantitative Trading to Artificial Intelligence
-
Kobe the husky dog digs a hole and saves a neighborhood from a gas leak catastrophe
-
Serbian opposition supporters return to the streets claiming fraud in last month’s election