Current:Home > FinanceThe Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the Constitution-DB Wealth Institute B2 Reviews & Ratings
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the Constitution
lotradecoin historical trading data access View Date:2024-12-25 16:10:19
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
The justices will review laws enacted by Republican-dominated legislatures and signed by Republican governors in Florida and Texas. While the details vary, both laws aim to prevent the social media companies from censoring users based on their viewpoints.
The court’s announcement, three days before the start of its new term, comes as the justices continue to grapple with how laws written at the dawn of the digital age, or earlier, apply to the online world.
The justices had already agreed to decide whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts, an issue that previously came up in a case involving then-President Donald Trump. The court dismissed the Trump case when his presidential term ended in January 2021.
Separately, the high court also could consider a lower-court order limiting executive branch officials’ communications with social media companies about controversial online posts.
The new case follows conflicting rulings by two appeals courts, one of which upheld the Texas law, while the other struck down Florida’s statute. By a 5-4 vote, the justices kept the Texas law on hold while litigation over it continues.
But the alignment was unusual. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted to grant the emergency request from two technology industry groups that challenged the law in federal court.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to remain in effect. In dissent, Alito wrote, “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.”
Proponents of the laws, including Republican elected officials in several states that have similar measures, have sought to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right.
The tech sector warned that the laws would prevent platforms from removing extremism and hate speech.
Without offering any explanation, the justices had put off consideration of the case even though both sides agreed the high court should step in.
The justices had other social media issues before them last year, including a plea the court did not embrace to soften legal protections tech companies have for posts by their users.
veryGood! (43838)
Related
- TikToker Nicole Renard Warren Claps Back Over Viral Firework Display at Baby’s Sex Reveal
- Taylor Momsen of The Pretty Reckless bitten by a bat onstage: 'I must really be a witch'
- Arizona police officer killed, another injured in shooting at Gila River Indian Community
- Garry Conille arrives in Haiti to take up the post of prime minister
- Wisconsin’s Evers urges federal judge not to make changes at youth prison in wake of counselor death
- 'Cowardly act': Over 200 pride flags stolen in Massachusetts town overnight, police say
- Shocking revelations from 'Life & Murder of Nicole Brown Simpson' Lifetime documentary
- What to know about Mexico’s historic elections Sunday that will likely put a woman in power
- Kim Kardashian Says Her Four Kids Try to Set Her Up With Specific Types of Men
- Toyota recalls over 100,000 trucks, Lexus SUVs over possible debris in engine
Ranking
- Collin Gosselin Says He Was Discharged from the Marines Due to Being Institutionalized by Mom Kate
- Salt in the Womb: How Rising Seas Erode Reproductive Health
- Gabby Petito's Mom Forgives Brian Laundrie for Killing Her Daughter But Not His Evil Mother
- Overnight shooting in Ohio street kills 1 man and wounds 26 other people, news reports say
- Video shows 2 toddlers in diapers, distraught in the middle of Texas highway after crash
- Democrats wanted an agreement on using artificial intelligence. It went nowhere
- BIT TREASURE: Bitcoin mining, what exactly are we digging for? Comprehensively analyze the mining process and its impact
- 'Cowardly act': Over 200 pride flags stolen in Massachusetts town overnight, police say
Recommendation
-
Drugs to treat diabetes, heart disease and blood cancers among those affected by price negotiations
-
Watch this Marine run with shelter dogs to help them get adopted
-
Tallahassee mayor says cost from May 10 tornadoes now tops $50 million as city seeks federal aid
-
USWNT officially kicks off the Emma Hayes Era. Why the early returns are promising.
-
Jim Harbaugh wants to hire Colin Kaepernick to Chargers' coaching staff. Will the QB bite?
-
LGBTQ representation in government is growing but still disproportionate: Graphics explain
-
Police kill man with gun outside New Hampshire home improvement store
-
Charlotte the Stingray Is Not Pregnant, Aquarium Owner Confirms While Sharing Diagnosis